¿Qué te parece la instalación de videocámaras en parques y riberas?
Hay actualmente 8 comentarios
I waited egnouh so that some one else posts something for me so that I can comment with Khiale Rahat :) I like the way you are saying. Well we have open stacks here but the way you have it there sounds better! Anyway ye mozzoe bi rabt I was looking at farsi stacks in our university the other day I saw some farsi books published in Day mah 1382 baba in che vazeshe ketabe hanouz ye mah az chapesh dar iran nagzashteh inja chi kar mikone?
I'm really ipsermsed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it is rare to see a great blog like this one these days. http://gxamrphnzyn.com [url=http://qydozu.com]qydozu[/url] [link=http://wwdovxb.com]wwdovxb[/link]
If you sue over a battery leiakng, then I will sue because I got onions on my hamburger when I asked for no onions. Keep it up and you lawsuit happy people will make everything too expensive to own, except to the lawyers who make all the money.
In the modern day, what petnlay should there be, if any, for adultery? People are mixing up two concepts: criminal violations, which are punished by the state, and civil causes of action, in which private parties sue each other for damages. Alienation of Affection is a civil cause of action which still exists in a few states. Most have abandoned it as a concept, in part due to its basis in the doctrine of women as property and in part due to the fact that it is factually untenable. When you sue under this cause of action,you do not sue your spouse who ran off with the co-worker, you sue the co-worker for stealing your spouse. That's how it works, and that's the only way this particular tort works. So the question most courts have asked is whether it is really possible for one party in a marriage to be stolen by someone else or whether, in fact, the person is actually a free agent who left of their own accord. Most courts have correctly concluded that people are not stolen but leave of their own free will, and this cause of action has been mostly consigned to the dustbin. Utah technically still allows you to sue under this tort, but no damages have been awarded under it for a long time, and it is highly doubtful that such an award would be upheld on appeal.Adultery is still a crime in some states, however, as is fornication and oral sex. I don't know how many but it really doesn't matter because it is never enforced. Police in most states have much better things to do than arrest people for having consensual sex. So those of you who are looking for a punishment for adultery will have to look to God because, as far as the law is concerned, there really isn't one. No contract damages are ever awarded for adultery, because the law does not regard the act of adultery as a breach of contract resulting in monetary damages. Monetary damages may result from divorce, but that is a separate concept, governed by a separate set of laws. In domestic law in most states, adultery is not relevant to determine alimony or other monetary issues. Property division is generally 50/50 and alimony is based on need and ability to pay. These laws are the result of a long history of trial and error, and basing such issues on whether or not one party committed adultery would be turning back the clock significantly. It should be remembered that adultery is rarely subject to easy proof, and in many cases, adultery is only a symptom, not the root cause of the end of a marriage.
tengo 40 años y creo q en tema d seguridad ciudadana stamos viviendo peor q cuando era un niño. atracos/robos con violencia, alunizajes, palizas a profesores, violaciones, asesinatos...
un largo etcétera q se podía corregir con más mano dura. ZP, nos vas a llevar a la ruina!!!
Pues a mi me parece francamente mal. La privacidad debería ser lo primero por encima de unos grafitis o unas papeleras quemadas.
Dice El Zorro:
Que se grabe y que sirva para que todo aquel que no respeta las propiedades de los ciudadanos pase una temporadita fuera de la sociedad.
Dice JUAN SIN MIEDO:
¿ACEPTARA UN JUEZ LA GRABACION
COMO PRUEBA TESTIFICAL?.- Si así fuera, pues "MAKANUDO"; pero y si dice SSª ke nó, y el grabado se rebota contra el grabador, por ser captada su imagen sin su consentimien to. Creo kes jugar en dos aguas, hasta que la grabación no esté dentro de la legalidad
y autorizada de antemano.